<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Market-Dynamics on BRYSGO</title><link>https://www.brysgo.com/tags/market-dynamics/</link><description>Recent content in Market-Dynamics on BRYSGO</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.brysgo.com/tags/market-dynamics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Your Brand Premium Is a Bet on Human Irrationality — AI Just Called It</title><link>https://www.brysgo.com/post/2026-04-29-your-brand-premium-is-a-bet-on-human-irrationality-ai-just-called-it/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:33:50 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.brysgo.com/post/2026-04-29-your-brand-premium-is-a-bet-on-human-irrationality-ai-just-called-it/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The reason Nike can charge $180 for a $12 shoe is that humans are bad at comparison shopping — and that exploit is about to be patched.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t mean that as a criticism of Nike. They built something real: a brand, a story, a feeling. But if you&amp;rsquo;re honest about the mechanics, a significant portion of that $168 margin exists not because of the story itself, but because most people lack the time, attention, and information infrastructure to ask whether the story is worth $168. That&amp;rsquo;s a different thing. One is value creation. The other is value extraction through friction.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>